ArticleJRSM open2026
Symptom burden in multiple long-term conditions: An AI-supported, mixed-methods concept elicitation study.
Article in JRSM open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop the conceptual framework for an MLTC-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), the Symptom Burden Questionnaire™ for MLTC (SBQ™-MLTC). Design: Mixed-methods study: (1) symptom list generation; (2) assessment of list face validity; and (3) construction of a conceptual framework. Setting: Concept elicitation and conceptual framework development using existing PROMs identified through the Mapi Research Trust PROQOLID eCOA database and AI-generated symptom lists. Participants: Fifty-one condition-specific PROMs with evidence of patient involvement during concept elicitation were included for symptom extraction. ChatGPT-4 generated symptom lists for 24 conditions prevalent in MLTC. Seventeen healthcare practitioners reviewed symptom relevance and contributed to refinement of the conceptual framework. Main outcome measures: Identification, refinement, and organisation of relevant MLTC symptoms into body system and functional domains, and development of the SBQ™-MLTC's conceptual framework. Results: ePROVIDE searches in July and August 2023 identified 51 condition-specific PROMs for 24 conditions prevalent in MLTC. ChatGPT-4 was prompted to generate a list of 75 symptoms for each condition. A merged list of 2202 symptoms was iteratively reduced to 190 symptoms for healthcare practitioner review. The final conceptual framework included 151 symptoms spanning 18 body system and functional domains. Conclusions: This study represents the first phase in the development of an MLTC-specific PROM of symptom burden. Generative AI output triangulated with content from existing PROMs and healthcare practitioner review proved a feasible approach to concept elicitation. Planned cognitive debriefing will confirm content validity of the SBQ™-MLTC for people with lived experience. In the future, the SBQ™-MLTC could support integrated, symptom-led approaches for clinical management of MLTC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.