ArticleClinical epidemiology2026
Clinical Prediction Model for Target Lesion Revascularization Within One Year After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: Nationwide Analysis Within the Netherlands Heart Registration.
Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- One-Year Target Lesion Revascularization Prediction Shows Uncertain Incremental Accuracy After Competing-Death Exclusion [Letter].Clinical epidemiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to develop and validate a clinical prediction model for target lesion revascularization (TLR) at one-year follow-up in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with implantation of a drug-eluting stent (DES). Patients and Methods: Using real-world data from the Netherlands Heart Registration, we included patients treated with at least one DES between 2019 and October 2022. The study cohort comprised 96,758 patients from 29 centers, while a sub-cohort of 11,789 patients from 11 centers had additional procedural data. Multivariable logistic regression with backward stepwise selection was used for model development. Final coefficients were pooled across 20 imputed datasets, and separate models were built for both cohorts. Results: The study cohort model included age, sex, interaction between age and sex, diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, multivessel disease, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), cardiogenic shock, previous myocardial infarction, previous coronary intervention, access site, number of treated vessels, PCI in the left main, and PCI in arterial or venous grafts. The optimism-corrected area under the curve (AUC) was 0.645 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.633-0.657). The sub-cohort model incorporated total stent length in the left anterior descending artery, arterial or venous grafts, and left main, along with renal insufficiency, previous coronary intervention, and OHCA, yielding an AUC of 0.662 (95% CI: 0.631-0.693). Conclusion: The developed models provide a basis for predicting one-year TLR using routinely collected data. Despite strong calibration, their modest discrimination suggests a need for more detailed variables and advanced modelling approaches to improve performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.