ArticleEvolutionary applications2026
Phylogeny of Cutthroat Trout (
Article in Evolutionary applications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genetic rescue stabilizes diversity in small isolated populations of Bonneville cutthroat trout.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the important role that species concepts and taxonomy play in understanding the evolution of species, taxonomists have struggled to describe the relationship between many organisms. Here, using Cutthroat Trout as a case study, we illustrate how full mitochondrial genomes and broad taxonomic sampling can provide further insight on disputed taxonomic relationships, and aid in management and conservation decisions of different species. Inconsistencies in the taxonomy of Cutthroat Trout inspired a special workshop at the 2015 annual meeting of the American Fisheries Society that emphasized the need for revision. To further resolve the relationship between different Cutthroat Trout groups, we sequenced and assembled full mitochondrial genomes from 123 Cutthroat Trout from across their native range. We used maximum likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic approaches to examine the evolutionary relationships between all named Cutthroat Trout subspecies. Through these analyses, we find eight lineages of Cutthroat Trout that diverged more than one million years ago, and at least 12 lineages that diverged more than 790 thousand years ago, highlighting that despite the ancient split with Rainbow Trout at around ten million years ago, the modern diversity seen within the Cutthroat Trout Species Complex is much more recent. We do not find that Coastal, Westslope, or Lahontan Cutthroat Trout are substantially more different than the lineages in the Yellowstone complex. As such, we continue to recognize a single Cutthroat Trout species (
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.