ReviewComprehensive reviews in food science and food safety2026
From Single Foods to Whole Diets: A Critical Framework for Protein Quality Assessment Accounting for Complementarity and Matrix Effects.
Review in Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate protein quality assessment is fundamental to food science and nutrition policy, yet the two dominant metrics, the Protein Digestibility-Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS) and the Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS), evaluate foods in isolation, identifying a single limiting indispensable amino acid (AA) per source. Although PDCAAS and DIAAS are broadly applicable, their single-food approach is especially limiting for plant-based proteins, where AA complementarity and food-matrix complexity are most pronounced. This single-food approach systematically underestimates protein adequacy in real-world diets, where diverse protein sources are consumed together and their AA profiles complement across meals and days. Compounding this limitation, food matrix composition, thermal processing, and product formulation reduce AA bioaccessibility relative to ingredient-level scores, as shown, for example, by in vitro DIAAS analyses of protein bars and processing losses of reactive lysine in plant-based products, effects single-food metrics cannot capture. This critical review synthesizes experimental evidence that protein quality is both additive and accurately predictable at the meal and dietary level, and proposes a whole-diet protein quality (WDPQ) framework that pools digestible indispensable AA contributions across daily intake to identify limiting AAs at the dietary rather than the single-food level. Applied to Mediterranean, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), and pregnancy diets, as well as vulnerable populations, WDPQ yields corrected protein values 18%-30% higher than conventional single-food summation, materially altering assessments of dietary adequacy. The WDPQ framework is implementable using existing PDCAAS and DIAAS data and has implications for protein labeling, dietary guidelines, and the nutritional evaluation of plant-based food transitions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.