ArticleJournal of global health2026
Global epidemiological and aetiological patterns of hand, foot, and mouth disease: a country-level scoping synthesis.
Article in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) has historically been predominantly reported in the Asia-Pacific region, while its global epidemiology and aetiology remain fragmented and incompletely characterised. We aimed to synthesise currently available country-level evidence to describe global epidemiological and aetiological patterns of HFMD. Methods: We conducted a country-level scoping synthesis of published studies and publicly available surveillance reports through August 2025. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported epidemiological or aetiological data on HFMD at the national or subnational level, including case numbers, incidence, outbreaks, and enterovirus (EV) serotype distributions. We qualitatively synthesised the data, with a focus on surveillance availability, epidemiological trends, and major circulating EV serotypes. Results: Reported HFMD incidence declined during the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequently rebounded in many settings, in some settings exceeding pre-pandemic levels. Aetiological evidence suggests an increasing circulation of coxsackievirus A6 in multiple regions, with coxsackievirus A16 and EV A71 continuing to co-circulate in specific settings. However, routine epidemiological and aetiological surveillance remained largely concentrated in the Asia-Pacific region. In many other countries, available data were limited and primarily derived from outbreak-driven or sporadic studies. Heterogeneity was observed in surveillance systems and data availability across countries. Conclusions: Global HFMD epidemiological and aetiological patterns are characterised by disparities in surveillance capacity and data availability. Developing standardised surveillance and aetiological monitoring is essential to further understand the global landscape of HFMD, improve data comparability, support early detection of epidemiological changes, and inform evidence-based prevention and control strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.