ArticleCancer research2026
Ligand-Blocking and Agonist Antibodies Targeting TNFR2 Use Distinct Modes of Action to Induce Antitumor Immunity.
Article in Cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer treatment, responses are largely restricted to targeting CTLA-4 and PD-(L)1. TNFR2 has been identified as a promising target, but further therapeutic development requires a better understanding of whether agonists or blockers should be used and whether FcγR interactions promote efficacy. In this study, we engineered two distinct α-TNFR2 antibody types: ligand-blocking FcγR-engaging versus non-ligand-blocking agonist antibodies. Both showed potent antitumor efficacy across multiple syngeneic mouse tumor models and combined effectively with α-PD-1. The ligand-blocking antibody depleted intratumoral regulatory T cells (Treg) and reprogrammed the myeloid compartment, directing monocytes toward a proinflammatory macrophage and dendritic cell trajectory. Interestingly, this effect depended on both inhibitory and activating FcγRs, reflecting the simultaneous action on Tregs and myeloid cells. In contrast, the agonist directly costimulated T and NK cells, partially through FcγR-independent mechanisms. Both antibodies converged on activating tumor-specific CD8+ T cells mediating tumor rejection. Clinical assessment of both ligand-blocking (BI-1808) and agonist (BI-1910) α-TNFR2 antibodies is currently ongoing. SIGNIFICANCE: Identification and mechanistic characterization of two functionally distinct TNFR2 targeting antibodies highlights factors important for leveraging this target for successful cancer immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.