Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42467148›Full record

ArticleInterdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences2026

Multi-GraphDDI: Multi-Feature Fusion and Interaction for Graph-Based Drug-Drug Interaction Prediction.

Xiaodan Wang, Hongjian Li, Jihong Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiaodan WangThe School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Wuguishan, Zhongshan, 528458, China.
Hongjian LiThe School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Wuguishan, Zhongshan, 528458, China.
Jihong WangThe School of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Guangdong University of Education, Huadu, Guangzhou, 510810, China. redblue04@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9652-0072

Funding

China University Industry-Academia-Research Innovation Fund 2024MZ036Guangdong Provincial Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine Research Project 20252015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) can compromise therapeutic efficacy and patient safety, making accurate computational prediction highly important in drug discovery and clinical decision support. We propose Multi-GraphDDI, a structure-only framework that predicts DDIs without relying on external biological networks. In this model, three complementary molecular fingerprints, namely extended-connectivity fingerprints (ECFP4), PubChem fingerprints, and pharmacophore fingerprints, are encoded as three grayscale channels and fused into a single image representation, while a parallel branch transforms the two-dimensional molecular graph into a topology-aware embedding through a five-layer residual graph isomorphism network (GIN). A bidirectional feature-interaction module together with four-head cross-attention is then used to align the image-based and graph-based representations, and the fused features are further used to estimate interaction scores. On ChCh-Miner, ZhangDDI, and DeepDDI, Multi-GraphDDI achieved AUC/AUPR/F1 scores of 0.9986/0.9998/0.9730, 0.9858/0.9633/0.8855, and 0.9922/0.9920/0.9598, respectively, outperforming competing methods. These results indicate that integrating heterogeneous structural cues through coarse- and fine-grained feature interaction provides an effective and scalable solution for DDI prediction.

Indexed as

BFIMDenseNetFingerprintsGIN-ResGraphDDI

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.