Observational studyAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Patterns of Care and Follow-up of Patients with an Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Event After Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study in the Netherlands.
Observational study in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study investigated patterns of care and oncological outcomes in patients with ipsilateral breast tumor events (IBTE) after prior breast-conserving surgery (BCS) treated with curative intent.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on IBTE patients treated in 2016-2017 at 34 Dutch hospitals. Patient and characteristics, along with treatment details were collected and descriptive statistics were used for analysis. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were evaluated by using Kaplan-Meier analyses.
resultsOf the 486 IBTE patients, 75.1% were diagnosed more than 5 years after the primary tumor, 87.4% had invasive breast cancer, and 12.6% DCIS. Distinguishing true recurrences from second primaries was not possible. Among invasive IBTE, 70 (14.6%) had primary DCIS and 350 (72.8%) an invasive primary tumor. Most IBTEs (54.9%) were T1, grade II (46.5%), and ER/PR+/HER2- (61.7%). Seventy-two (14.8%) patients received neoadjuvant systemic therapy. Salvage mastectomy was performed in 435 (89.5%) patients, while 51 (10.5%) underwent repeat BCS; 60.8% of these received postoperative whole-breast re-irradiation. Among mastectomy patients, 411 (94.5%) had prior radiotherapy; 13.1% received repeat radiotherapy, either alone (24.1%) or with hyperthermia (75.9%). Adjuvant systemic therapy was administered to 64.9%. After a median follow-up of 37 months, 83 (17.4%) developed a subsequent event: 33 (39.8%) second IBTE, 9 regional recurrences, and 41 (49.4%) distant metastases. Three- and five-year OS was 89% and 72.5%, respectively. Three- and five-year DFS was 85.5% and 69.9%, respectively. Three- and five-year BCSS was 95.1% and 86%, respectively.
conclusionsSalvage mastectomy was the predominant treatment for IBTE, although repeat BCS with re-irradiation is increasingly performed in selected low-risk patients. Survival outcomes were favorable. The study highlights the need for tumor re-assessment and emphasizes the variability in IBTE management, underscoring the need for standardized treatment guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.