ReviewIntensive care medicine2026
Key principles for rehabilitation of critically ill patients with obesity.
Review in Intensive care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePatients with obesity who are admitted to an ICU bring specific challenges for rehabilitation during and after critical illness. This narrative review explores impact of differences in body compositions and pathophysiology on outcomes to summarise interprofessional, patient-centred rehabilitation strategies across the trajectory of recovery.
methodsThe interprofessional expert panel reviewed major trials and guidelines, integrating their clinical expertise with the current evidence.
resultsThree distinct phenotypes potentially influence outcomes for survivors. Whilst patients with preserved muscle mass may have a survival advantage, the phenotypes characterised by ectopic visceral fat or sarcopenia are frequently complicated by multimorbidity and polypharmacy, likely increasing the risk of adverse effects such as suboptimal sedation, prolonged ventilation and immobilisation, malnutrition, and impaired recovery. Targeted respiratory interventions, including secretion-clearance techniques and appropriate patient positioning to prevent atelectasis, reduce the work of breathing. Optimisation of communication and swallowing function is an essential component for facilitating safe oral intake and promoting active patient participation in rehabilitation. Concurrently, targeted nutrition strategies combined with early, targeted, progressive mobilisation might mitigate ICU acquired weakness and support functional recovery. The availability of appropriate weight‑based equipment is fundamental to ensuring safe mobilisation for both patients and healthcare professionals.
conclusionInterprofessional collaboration is central to optimising outcomes and should extend beyond the ICU to structured post-ICU follow-up to address persistent, worsening, or newly emerging health impairments. Early rehabilitation in critically ill patients with obesity should integrate physiological, logistical, and psychosocial considerations to support equitable and functional recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.