ReviewArchives of microbiology2026
CRISPR/cas-based biosensors for point-of-care testing: a comprehensive review of signal readout strategies.
Review in Archives of microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The CRISPR/Cas system has emerged as a transformative tool for nucleic acid detection, offering significant potential for point-of-care testing (POCT). However, translating CRISPR/Cas-based assays into practical POCT devices critically depends on the development of portable, sensitive, and user-friendly signal readout modalities. This review systematically compares four major readout modalities: fluorescence, electrochemical, colorimetric, and distance‑based readout, analyzing their mechanisms, analytical performance, and practical limitations. Key challenges, including sample preparation, amplification-free detection, multiplexing, and commercialization barriers, are critically assessed. Finally, future perspectives are proposed: integrating microfluidics with smartphone‑based readout, leveraging artificial intelligence and the Internet of Things for automated signal interpretation and cloud connectivity, and establishing regulatory pathways for clinical translation. This review aims to provide actionable insights for researchers developing next‑generation CRISPR diagnostics and to accelerate the transition from laboratory prototypes to deployable POCT devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42467248What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.