ArticleHealth promotion international2026
Applying adaptive research methods to explore health literacy in young people with intellectual disability.
Article in Health promotion international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Young people with intellectual disability experience higher risks for chronic health conditions than their peers. Improving their health literacy could be a strengths-based approach for reducing these risks. However, there is limited research that explores the perspectives of young people with intellectual disability on their health literacy. Given the limited research centring on the voice of young people with intellectual disability, this study examined their health literacy from their own perspectives. We had two aims: (i) explore the health literacy skills and needs of young people with intellectual disability and (ii) apply an adaptive interviewing approach and describe insights about its effectiveness. The adaptive interviewing method included visual materials and communication partners as needed. Sixteen young people with intellectual disability aged between 12 and 22 years who communicated with words or nonverbally were interviewed online. Data was coded using directed content analysis following the framework of the Health Literacy Questionnaire. The findings showed variation in the participants' health literacy skills regarding relationships with healthcare professionals, managing health, and understanding health information. The results suggest that the health literacy skills of young people with intellectual disability are diverse, with different support needs. Targeted health promotion strategies are needed to meet these diverse needs. The adaptive interviewing was successful in capturing young people's perspectives. With further refinements, including use of in-person and repeat interviews, this approach can be further utilized to enhance the accessibility of research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.