ArticlePloS one2026
Pacing strategy patterns and performance outcomes in marathon running: A large-scale analysis of split time data.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although pacing strategy is widely recognized as critical for marathon performance, the actual distribution of pacing patterns among recreational runners and their associations with finish time across demographic groups have not been systematically characterized in large samples. This study analyzed split time data (i.e., cumulative elapsed times recorded at intermediate checkpoints including 5K, 10K, 15K, 20K, half-marathon, 25K, 30K, 35K, and 40K) from 78,912 finishers of the Boston Marathon (2015-2017), characterizing pacing profiles using the ratio of first-half to second-half completion times and segment-by-segment pace variations across these nine timing points. Cluster analysis was employed to identify distinct pacing patterns, and the relationships between pacing strategy and finish time were examined across age groups, sex, and performance levels using analysis of variance and multiple regression analysis. Four distinct pacing patterns were identified: even-pacing (maintaining consistent pace throughout; 47.9%), mild positive-splitting (controlled late-race slowing; 31.9%), strong positive-splitting (pronounced late-race slowing; 12.2%), and variable-pacing (highly inconsistent pace fluctuations; 8.0%). Even-pacing was consistently associated with the fastest finish times across age and performance strata (p < 0.001), with mean finish times markedly lower than those observed for strong positive-splitting (217 vs. 276 minutes). Variable-pacing was associated with the highest incidence of "hitting the wall" (pace decline >20% in the final segment; 85.4%). High-performance runners (<3:00 finish time) demonstrated significantly higher rates of even-pacing (82.0%) compared to casual participants (19.6%). Age and sex significantly influenced pacing strategy selection (p < 0.001). These findings may help inform marathon pacing guidance by indicating that age, sex, and performance level should be considered when interpreting pacing patterns and developing individualized race plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.