Trial reportPloS one2026
A phase III double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal trial of 5‑aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride with sodium ferrous citrate for efficacy and safety in patients diagnosed as Leigh syndrome.
Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveA phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal trial of SPP‑004 (5‑aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride and sodium ferrous citrate) was conducted to confirm the efficacy and safety of SPP-004 for maintenance of clinical response in patients diagnosed with Leigh syndrome (LS) showing central nervous system disorders.
methodsFifty-four patients entered a 24-week open-label period of SPP-004 administration. Among them, 28 patients who showed improvement on the Newcastle Paediatric Mitochondrial Disease Scale (NPMDS) for cranial nervous symptoms and myopathy symptoms proceeded to a 48-week double-blind (DB) period, where they were randomized (1:1) to receive SPP‑004 or placebo (n = 14 each). Efficacy was evaluated using NPMDS for the full analysis set (FAS) during the DB‑period (SPP-004 n = 13, Placebo n = 14) and the entire study period (n = 54). Safety evaluation focused on adverse events (AEs) in all 54 patients administered SPP-004.
resultsThe primary endpoint, the proportion of patients who discontinued due to inadequate efficacy at 48 weeks, was lower in the SPP-004 group (15.4% [95% CI: 1.9-45.4%]) compared to the placebo group (50.0% [23.0-77.0%]). Over 80% of the SPP-004 group showed maintained efficacy (p = 0.0486). All adverse drug reactions were mild, with no notable differences in AEs between groups.
conclusionThese findings suggest that SPP-004 is safe and may provide therapeutic effect for LS patients who achieved an initial clinical response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.