Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42467719›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2026

Long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes after vacuum-assisted delivery: A population-based cohort study.

Ida Björk, Jenny Bolk, Gunilla Ajne, Ängla Mantel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ida BjörkDepartment of CLINTEC, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0137-4137
Jenny BolkDepartment of Medicine Solna, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4240-261X
Gunilla AjneDepartment of CLINTEC, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2276-3212
Ängla MantelTheme Women's Health, Department of Obstetrics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVacuum-assisted delivery (VAD) is widely used in obstetric care, yet concerns remain regarding potential long-term neurodevelopmental sequelae in offspring, particularly after procedures performed at higher fetal head stations. Evidence on long-term outcomes after VAD remains limited. Given the safety concerns surrounding VAD, we investigated neonatal and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes after VAD stratified by fetal head station, using emergency cesarean delivery (ECD) and spontaneous vaginal delivery as reference groups. METHODS AND

findingsIn this population-based cohort study, we obtained data from nationwide health registers and included all singleton births to primiparous women in Sweden between 1997 and 2014, with follow-up through December 31, 2021. Differences in neonatal outcomes across delivery modes were estimated using multivariable logistic regression models to obtain odds ratios (ORs). All children were followed longitudinally for adverse long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes-a diagnosis of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder [ADHD], autism spectrum disorder [ASD], cerebral palsy [CP], epilepsy [EP], or intellectual disability [ID]. Rates of long-term outcomes were compared using multivariable Cox regression models to obtain hazard ratios (HRs). All analyses were stratified by child sex. Analyses of neonatal outcomes were adjusted for maternal age, body mass index (BMI), gestational age, pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, and diabetes mellitus type I/II. Long-term analyses were additionally adjusted for smoking status, child's birth year, chorioamnionitis, maternal education level, and maternal psychiatric comorbidity. Among 630,985 term singleton births, median follow-up was 13-14 years. Compared with ECD, mid/low VAD was associated with increased odds of neonatal intracranial hemorrhage (traumatic aOR 7.20, 95% CI [2.97, 17.45]; non-traumatic aOR 3.65, 95% CI [2.41, 5.52]; subgaleal hematoma aOR 3.35, 95% CI [2.68, 4.20]; and neonatal seizures aOR 1.85, 95% CI [1.52, 2.26]), but with lower odds of meconium aspiration (aOR 0.53, 95% CI [0.42, 0.67]). In long-term follow-up, mid/low VAD showed no increased risks for ADHD, ASD, CP, or epilepsy, and a reduced risk of intellectual disability (aHR 0.80, 95% CI [0.67, 0.96]) as compared with ECD. Outlet VAD-similar to spontaneous vaginal delivery-was associated with lower risks of adverse neonatal and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes compared with ECD. The main limitations of this study were the lack of information on the indication for intervention and whether emergency cesarean deliveries were performed in the first or second stage of labor.

conclusionsIn this nationwide cohort, mid/low VAD was associated with higher neonatal morbidity but no increased risk of long-term neurodevelopmental disorders. Outlet VAD showed no signal of adverse long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. These findings provide reassuring evidence regarding the long-term safety of VAD when performed appropriately and help address an important knowledge gap regarding long-term outcomes after VAD. However, comparisons between delivery modes should be interpreted cautiously, as the clinical circumstances leading to VAD and ECD differ and are incompletely captured in register data. The findings should therefore not be interpreted as evidence to guide acute choice of delivery mode.

Indexed as

Neurodevelopmental DisordersVacuum Extraction, ObstetricalAdultCesarean SectionChildCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNeurodevelopmentPregnancyRegistriesRisk FactorsSweden

Identifiers

PMID42467719
PMCPMC13395438

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.