ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2026
Ectoparasitism and the gut microbiota: a cross-fostering experiment in a wild passerine.
Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The gut microbiota plays a key role in host development, physiology, and immunity, and is likely shaped by hosts' genetic and environmental factors, including ectoparasitism and, thus, host health. Here, we experimentally manipulated ectoparasite (Carnus hemapterus) abundance in spotless starling (Sturnus unicolor) nests. We evaluated its hypothesized disruptive effects on nestling gut microbiota and explored also whether the effects depend on sibling relatedness using a partial cross-fostering design. Experimentally increased parasitism significantly affected alpha but not beta diversity of the bacterial community in 14-day-old cross-fostered nestlings, i.e. those non-genetically related to their social parents and siblings. The experimental parasite manipulation also affected the relative abundance of 123 bacterial strains, including fermenters, mucosa-adapted bacterial symbionts, and opportunistic pathogens. Finally, gut microbiota composition was also associated with nestling phenotype (body mass, wing and tarsus length, carotenoid concentration, and telomere dynamics). Sparse PLS network analyses linked body mass (positively: Erysipelatoclostridium, Parabacteroides, and Helicobacter; negatively: Salmonella) and parasitism intensity (negatively: Dubosiella, Rickettsiella, and Helicobacter) with relative abundance of specific bacterial strains. These results provide the first evidence in natural conditions that the effects of ectoparasites on gut microbiota depend on genetic relatedness between nestlings and parents, highlighting the complex interplay between parasitism, microbiota, and host traits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.