Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42467970›Full record

ArticleJMIR AI2026

Enhancing Large Language Models for Identifying and Prioritizing Important Medical Jargons From Electronic Health Record Notes Using Data Augmentation: Comparative Study.

Won Seok Jang, Sharmin Sultana, Zonghai Yao, Hieu Tran, Zhichao Yang, Sunjae Kwon, Hong Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Won Seok Jang *Miner School of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5439-7299
Sharmin Sultana *Miner School of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8016-9329
Zonghai Yao *Manning College of Information & Computer Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5707-8410
Hieu TranManning College of Information & Computer Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1035-7395
Zhichao YangManning College of Information & Computer Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2797-4257
Sunjae KwonManning College of Information & Computer Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5425-6779
Hong YuMiner School of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9263-5035

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpenNotes allows patients to access their electronic health record (EHR) notes through online patient portals. However, EHR notes contain abundant medical jargon, which can be difficult for patients to comprehend. One way to improve comprehension is by reducing information overload and helping patients focus on the medical terms that matter most to them.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate both closed-source and open-source large language models (LLMs) for extracting and prioritizing medical jargon from EHR notes relevant to individual patients, leveraging prompting techniques, fine-tuning, and data augmentation.

methodsWe evaluated the performance of closed-source and open-source LLMs on a dataset of 90 expert-annotated EHR notes. We tested various combinations of settings, including (1) general and structured prompts, (2) zero-shot and few-shot prompting, (3) fine-tuning, and (4) data augmentation. To enhance the extraction and prioritization capabilities of open-source models in low-resource settings, we applied data augmentation using GPT-4o and integrated a ranking technique to refine the training process. Additionally, to measure the impact of dataset size, we fine-tuned the models by incrementally increasing the size of the augmented dataset from 10 to 9995 and tested their performance. The effectiveness of the models was assessed using 10-fold cross-validation, providing a comprehensive evaluation across various settings. We report the F

resultsOur results show that open-source models achieved the highest performance, particularly when using fine-tuning with a gold-standard dataset. Under Jaccard Index-based string matching, DeepSeek 8B set the benchmarks with an F

conclusionsThe evaluation of both closed-source and open-source LLMs highlighted the effectiveness of prompting strategies, fine-tuning, and data augmentation in enhancing model performance in low-resource scenarios.

Indexed as

comprehensiondata augmentationEHRelectronic health recordlarge language modelsLLMspatient educationpatient engagement

Identifiers

PMID42467970
PMCPMC13428209

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.