ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
RAG: a regularized adaptive graph-based method for rare-cell identification from single-cell expression data.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rare-cell identification is essential for dissecting disease mechanisms and developmental programs. Existing methods mostly rely on fixed-size neighbourhood graphs to separate rare-cell populations in single-cell expression data, which may embed rare cells into dominant clusters under varying sampling densities. This paper proposes the RAG method for identifying rare cells based on regularized adaptive graphs, which can better separate rare cells. Specifically, the regularized adaptive graph is constructed by estimating cell-specific radii from Euclidean-cosine hybrid dissimilarity to constrain effective neighbours and stabilize the adjacency, and then, assigning locally scaled hybrid affinities to make affinity magnitudes comparable across density-varying regions. Across 10 real single-cell RNA sequencing datasets, RAG overall outperformed six state-of-the-art methods, improving precision, F1 score, and rare-type coverage rate over the second-ranked baseline by 42%, 26%, and 35%, respectively. A case study on colorectal tumour tissue shows that RAG is more accurate in recovering annotated rare-cell populations and separating the substructure from the major population than the other evaluated methods. Further analyses on mouse airway epithelium and two pancreas datasets showed that about half of RAG-resolved small clusters corresponded to known annotated populations or marker-supported subpopulations. The source code is available at https://github.com/wangxingsu/RAG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.