Evidence mapPaperPMID 42469452Full record

ReviewBasic research in cardiology2026

Historical account of reperfusion therapy and the development of cardioprotection beyond reperfusion.

Gerd Heusch, Petra Kleinbongard, Bernard J Gersh

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Basic research in cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gerd HeuschCardioprotection Unit, Institute for Pathophysiology, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany. Gerd.heusch@uk-essen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7078-4160
Petra KleinbongardCardioprotection Unit, Institute for Pathophysiology, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Bernard J GershDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

Cost Action CARDIOPROTECTION CA 16225Cost Action CARDIOPROTECTION ICG 16225COST Action METAHEART CA22169Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft RTG 2989Pancreatic Cancer Action Network CA 16225Pancreatic Cancer Action Network ICG 16225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The only way to salvage myocardium from infarction is timely reperfusion of the occluded coronary artery. Timely reperfusion reduces infarct size and mortality. The history of reperfusion therapy from the first clinical use of intravenous streptokinase in patients with acute myocardial infarction by Sherry et al. in the late 1950s, over seminal experimental dog studies by Ross Jr. et al., demonstrating infarct size reduction by timely reperfusion in the early 1970s, to a more systematic use of initially streptokinase and a later tissue plasminogen activator in clinical trials (GISSI, TIMI), the addition of platelet inhibition (ISIS) and ultimately mechanical recanalization by percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting, is reviewed in detail. Cardioprotection beyond timely reperfusion was first demonstrated in the seminal experimental dog studies of ischemic conditioning by Murry, Reimer, and Jennings in the 1980s and initiated a tsunami of experimental studies in various experimental models to identify the underlying signal transduction, but has not yet been established in clinical practice. Clinical trials on various forms of ischemic conditioning, potentially cardioprotective drugs and transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation, are still underway.

Indexed as

CardioprotectionMyocardial infarctionPercutaneous coronary interventionReperfusionThrombolysis

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.