ReviewBasic research in cardiology2026
Historical account of reperfusion therapy and the development of cardioprotection beyond reperfusion.
Review in Basic research in cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The only way to salvage myocardium from infarction is timely reperfusion of the occluded coronary artery. Timely reperfusion reduces infarct size and mortality. The history of reperfusion therapy from the first clinical use of intravenous streptokinase in patients with acute myocardial infarction by Sherry et al. in the late 1950s, over seminal experimental dog studies by Ross Jr. et al., demonstrating infarct size reduction by timely reperfusion in the early 1970s, to a more systematic use of initially streptokinase and a later tissue plasminogen activator in clinical trials (GISSI, TIMI), the addition of platelet inhibition (ISIS) and ultimately mechanical recanalization by percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting, is reviewed in detail. Cardioprotection beyond timely reperfusion was first demonstrated in the seminal experimental dog studies of ischemic conditioning by Murry, Reimer, and Jennings in the 1980s and initiated a tsunami of experimental studies in various experimental models to identify the underlying signal transduction, but has not yet been established in clinical practice. Clinical trials on various forms of ischemic conditioning, potentially cardioprotective drugs and transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation, are still underway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42469452What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.