ArticleInternational orthopaedics2026
Predicting postoperative coronal imbalance in Lenke 1/2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A machine learning model with clinical interpretability.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesSelective posterior thoracic fusion (sPTF) for Lenke 1/2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) aims to reconcile multi-planar correction with motion preservation. Nevertheless, postoperative coronal imbalance (CIB) frequently compromises these objectives. This study developed an interpretable machine learning architecture to stratify CIB risk and identify key predictors.
methodsData from 282 patients were analyzed. Following dual-stage dimensionality reduction (Boruta and LASSO) on 24 candidate predictors, ten machine learning architectures were trained and evaluated using split-sample internal validation. Model efficacy was evaluated via area under the curve (AUC), Brier score, and decision curve analysis, using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework for algorithmic transparency.
resultsThe LightGBM model demonstrated favorable performance, achieving peak AUC of 0.885 (training) and 0.824 (internal validation). SHAP identified three key predictors: the spatial relationship between the lowest instrumented vertebra and the last substantially touching vertebra (LIV-LSTV), regional lumbar adaptability (Lumbar Modifier), and skeletal maturity (Risser grade). Lower LIV-LSTV values, Lumbar Modifiers C, and lower Risser grades were associated with a higher predicted risk of CIB.
conclusionThis framework incorporates information on distal instrumentation selection, lumbar curve morphology, and skeletal maturity. The model may provide a preliminary basis for future preoperative CIB risk estimation and support a more informed assessment of the trade-off between deformity correction and preservation of lumbar motion segments. Independent external validation is required before the model can be used to guide surgical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42469513What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.