ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Population-specific dental maturity scores for forensic age estimation in turkish children: a percentile-based modeling approach.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate age estimation in children and adolescents is essential for forensic identification; however, the direct application of dental age estimation methods developed from Western European populations may introduce systematic bias when applied to other populations. This study aimed to develop and validate population-specific age estimation models based on the Dental Maturity Score (DMS) using data obtained from Turkish children. A total of 4,009 panoramic radiographs from individuals aged 2-18 years (2,035 males and 1,974 females) were included. Of these, 3,206 individuals constituted the model development (training) cohort and 803 the independent validation (test) cohort. The seven left permanent mandibular teeth were assessed according to the Demirjian staging system, and sex-specific DMSs were calculated. The relationship between chronological age and DMS was modeled using moving average, Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing (LOWESS), the Lambda-Mu-Sigma (LMS) method, piecewise polynomial regression, and polynomial- and spline-based quantile regression. Model performance was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R²), mean absolute error (MAE), and Bland-Altman agreement analysis. Among the evaluated approaches, the polynomial- and spline-based quantile regression models demonstrated the best overall performance. In the independent validation cohort, the polynomial-based quantile regression model achieved an R² of 0.94 and an MAE of 0.75 years in males, and an R² of 0.92 and an MAE of 1.09 years in females. Among the population-specific models developed for Turkish children, the polynomial-based quantile regression model demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy and consistent performance in the independent validation cohort, indicating that it is a suitable approach for forensic age estimation. In contrast, the spline-based quantile regression model provides a useful reference framework for the clinical assessment of dental development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42469521What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.