ReviewMolecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.)2026
The dual role of RIPK family in IBD: from cell death to therapeutic targeting.
Review in Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase (RIPK) family, particularly RIPK1, RIPK2, and RIPK3, functions as a central regulatory hub at the intersection of cell death and inflammatory signaling, critically shaping the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). These kinases exhibit context-dependent dual roles in maintaining intestinal homeostasis and driving mucosal inflammation. RIPK1 operates as a molecular switch, with its scaffold activity sustaining epithelial survival via the NF-κB and MAPK pathways, whereas its kinase activity promotes apoptosis and necroptosis under pathological conditions. RIPK2 acts as an essential adaptor downstream of nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein 1/2 (NOD1/2), mediating antimicrobial host defense while contributing to excessive inflammation upon dysregulation. RIPK3, a core executor of necroptosis, also exerts kinase-independent immunomodulatory functions that influence tissue repair and inflammatory resolution. Dysregulation of RIPK signaling disrupts epithelial barrier integrity, amplifies inflammatory cascades, and engages in crosstalk with other programmed cell death modalities, such as pyroptosis, thereby exacerbating chronic intestinal injury. Therapeutic targeting of RIPK pathways has shown promise in preclinical models; however, achieving selective modulation that suppresses pathogenic signaling while preserving physiological functions remains a critical challenge. We propose that function-selective targeting of RIPKs, rather than complete inhibition, represents an essential direction for future IBD therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.