ArticleCardiovascular diabetology2026
Lipoprotein(a), insulin resistance, and cardiovascular outcomes in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.
Article in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMetabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is associated with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and insulin resistance (IR) are established cardiovascular risk factors, yet their joint associations with cardiovascular outcomes in MASLD remain poorly understood.
methodsWe analyzed data from the UK Biobank and included 101,348 adults with MASLD for CVD mortality analyses and 94,089 individuals without baseline CVD for incident CVD analyses. IR was assessed using the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index. Participants were categorized according to Lp(a) levels (< 125 vs. ≥ 125 nmol/L) and TyG index (low vs. high, defined by the 75th percentile) and further classified into four joint Lp(a)/IR groups, with low Lp(a)/low IR serving as the reference group. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate associations of Lp(a), TyG, and their combined categories with incident CVD and CVD mortality.
resultsDuring a median follow-up of 15.7 years, elevated Lp(a) and higher TyG levels were each independently associated with increased risks of incident CVD and CVD mortality, regardless of each other's status. In the fully adjusted model, each SD increase in Lp(a) was associated with a 14% higher risk of CVD mortality (HR, 1.14; 95% CI 1.10-1.19; P < 0.001) and a 9% higher risk of incident CVD (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.07-1.11; P < 0.001). Similarly, each SD increase in TyG was associated with a 27% higher risk of CVD mortality (HR, 1.27; 95% CI 1.21-1.34; P < 0.001) and a 9% higher risk of incident CVD (HR, 1.09; 95% CI 1.07-1.12; P < 0.001). Compared with participants in the reference group with Lp(a) < 125 nmol/L and low IR, those with concomitantly elevated Lp(a) and high IR exhibited the highest cardiovascular risk, with adjusted HRs of 2.04 (95% CI 1.63-2.55) for CVD mortality and 1.49 (95% CI 1.35-1.64) for incident CVD (both P < 0.001), with a significant dose-response trend across groups (P for trend < 0.001). These associations remained consistent across subgroups stratified by age, sex, obesity, diabetes, and hypertension.
conclusionsElevated Lp(a) and IR were independently associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in MASLD, with the highest risk observed among individuals with concomitant elevations in both markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.