ArticleCancer medicine2026
The Influence of Resource Constraints on Risk-Related Conversations With Specialists Among a Community-Based Sample of Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinical guidelines recommend risk-management care for women with ≥ 20% lifetime risk of breast cancer (BC). Yet, guideline-concordant care-including conversations about BC risk with specialists-is low, and driving factors are not well understood. This study examined (a) associations between the material, psychosocial, and behavioral domains of financial constraint and BC risk conversations with genetics specialists and cancer/breast care specialists, and (b) whether competing resource demands are associated with the specialist BC conversations when controlling for insurance status (to disentangle the role of behavioral factors from material and psychological ones).
methodsNon-Hispanic Black or white women aged 18-74 years, with no history of cancer and ≥ 20% lifetime BC risk were recruited from online research volunteer databases, social media, and clinics. Participants completed an online survey about personal/family history, decision-making factors, and risk-management behavior. We used descriptive statistics to calculate proportions and both adjusted and unadjusted logistic regression to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.
resultsA total of 662 Black (34%) and white (66%) high-risk women comprised the analytic sample for this paper. Overall rates of specialist BC risk conversations were low: 43% had discussed their BC risk with any specialist (genetics specialist, breast specialist, and/or cancer specialist). In multivariate logistic regressions adjusted for race and age, perceived financial hardship was associated with lower odds of BC risk conversations with genetics (OR = 0.42 [95% CI: 0.25, 0.70]) and breast/cancer specialists (OR = 0.39 [95% CI: 0.24, 0.65]). Similar associations were observed for the relationships between disrupted insurance or single motherhood and specialist risk conversations.
conclusionsLimited financial and other resources are associated with lower rates of BC risk conversations with specialists, which are critical to risk management in high-risk women. Future work should further investigate the complexities of resource limitations in BC risk management and develop mitigation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.