ArticleJournal of diabetes research2026
Selection and Validation of Novel Biomarkers for ntOPN-Based Models for Diabetic Kidney Disease in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.
Article in Journal of diabetes research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Selection and Validation of Novel Biomarkers for ntOPN-Based Models for Diabetic Kidney Disease in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionWe previously found that urinary n-terminal osteopontin (ntOPN) performed well for predicting diabetic kidney disease (DKD). This study is aimed at screening potential biomarkers for improving ntOPN-based models in DKD detection and prediction.
methodsWe performed a cross-sectional and then prospective cohort study. The novel biomarkers for DKD development were selected by the SOMAscan platform. The selected biomarkers were further validated by the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) algorithm, Pearson correlation, and logistic regression. The ntOPN-based models for DKD prediction were established, evaluated, and utilized by machine learning.
resultsThe baseline growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) was selected by SOMAscan assays, and urinary GDF15 was validated as an independent predictor for DKD occurrence (adjusted OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.20-1.75) and progression (adjusted OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.15-1.75) by multivariate logistic regression. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the multibiomarker panel consisting of urinary ntOPN-to-creatinine ratio (UntOCR) and urinary GDF15-to-creatinine ratio (UGCR) had stronger abilities in forecasting the 2-year risk of DKD occurrence (AUC 0.838 vs. 0.818) and DKD progression (AUC 0.867 vs. 0.834) than the combination of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR
conclusionsCompared with eGFR
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.