Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42470695›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2026

Graph-based drug-target interaction modeling: from representation learning to output-driven drug discovery.

Thanh Nguyen, Hien Minh To, Duy Anh Nguyen, Duy Trieu, Giang Nguyen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thanh NguyenNanyang Biologics, 04-07 456 Alexandra Road, 119962, Singapore.ORCID 0009-0008-8537-4816
Hien Minh ToNanyang Biologics, 04-07 456 Alexandra Road, 119962, Singapore.
Duy Anh NguyenNanyang Biologics, 04-07 456 Alexandra Road, 119962, Singapore.
Duy TrieuNanyang Biologics, 04-07 456 Alexandra Road, 119962, Singapore.
Giang NguyenNanyang Biologics, 04-07 456 Alexandra Road, 119962, Singapore.

Funding

Nanyang Biologics 03159-25Nanyang Biologics A-25-10404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graph-based deep learning has emerged as a powerful framework for modeling drug-target interactions (DTIs), enabling the integration of molecular, structural, and systems-level information within a unified representation. In this review, we survey graph-based DTI models across biomedical network-, sequence/hybrid-, and structure-based paradigms, which form a continuum from large-scale association inference to structure-resolved interaction modeling with increasing mechanistic specificity. Beyond architectural advances, we introduce an output-driven perspective in which models are evaluated according to how well their predictions align with the informational and decision-making requirements of different stages of the drug discovery pipeline. Within this framework, attention mechanisms and semi-supervised learning are discussed as key developments that enhance feature prioritization and data efficiency in data-limited settings. We further examine how model outputs support applications ranging from target identification and drug repurposing to structure-guided lead optimization. Finally, we analyze key benchmarking challenges, including data leakage, sequence redundancy, and structural bias, and discuss emerging directions such as multimodal integration and the use of predicted protein structures. Together, this review provides a unified perspective on the design, evaluation, and translational application of graph-based DTI models.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDrug DiscoveryProteinsGraph Neural NetworksHumansRepresentation Machine LearningProteinsdeep learningdrug discoverydrug–target interactiongraph neural networksmolecular representationmultimodal learning

Identifiers

PMID42470695
PMCPMC13380308

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.