Evidence mapPaperPMID 42472001Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2026

An Evidence-Based Framework for Patient-Facing Artificial Intelligence Integration in the Emergency Department.

Tehreem Rehman, Philip Jarrett, Joshua Lesko, James Augustine, Bradley D Shy, Rohit B Sangal, Nicholas Genes, Donald U Apakama, Ethan E Abbott, Abhi Mehrotra and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tehreem RehmanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Philip JarrettDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Joshua LeskoEastern Virginia Medical School at ODU Emergency Medicine, Norfolk, Virginia, USA.
James AugustineDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio, USA.
Bradley D ShyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Rohit B SangalDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Nicholas GenesRonald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Donald U ApakamaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Ethan E AbbottDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Abhi MehrotraDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Richard Andrew TaylorDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergency department is a high-need setting for patient-facing artificial intelligence (PF-AI) because it functions as both a health care safety net and, increasingly, a digital front door for unscheduled acute care. We define PF-AI as tools that interact directly with patients to collect information, deliver tailored communication, and support decision making under clinician governance. This article presents a constrained framework for where PF-AI may add value across the emergency care journey-including structured intake, patient education, multilingual communication, and postdischarge follow-up-and where strict boundaries are required given risks of undertriage, confabulated content, workflow burden, privacy harm, inequitable access, cost escalation, and medico-legal ambiguity. We map operational touchpoints from prearrival to follow-up, specify information-flow and accountability checkpoints, and propose a human oversight model with defined escalation roles. The framework emphasizes equity, interoperability, usability, privacy, safety verification, and auditability, recognizing that PF-AI should augment rather than replace clinician judgment or existing non-AI workflows.

Indexed as

emergency medicinehealth equityhuman oversightlarge language modelsnatural language processingpatient-facing artificial intelligencepatient safety

Identifiers

PMID42472001
PMCPMC13380043

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.