ReviewJournal of orthopaedic translation2026
Neurogenic heterotopic ossification: from molecular mechanisms to clinical treatment.
Review in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emerging mechanisms and translational advances in musculoskeletal diseases.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurogenic heterotopic ossification (NHO), a disabling complication of severe central nervous system injuries, involves ectopic periarticular bone formation that causes profound functional impairments and reduced quality of life. This review highlights recent advances in NHO, especially focusing on the neuro-immune-osteogenic axis. Rather than a merely local disorder, NHO is a systemic response driven by neural, inflammatory, and interorgan signals, notably involving BMP/Smad, macrophage activation, and neuropeptide pathways. While combined-injury animal models advance mechanistic insights, they incompletely replicate human disease heterogeneity. Clinically, early diagnosis is hindered by nonspecific symptoms and insensitive radiography. Current treatments are mainly preventive or symptomatic, lacking efficacy for mature lesions. We highlight that addressing controversies in prophylaxis, surgical timing, and biomarker utility is essential. Future progress relies on validated early biomarkers, standardized imaging, mechanism-based therapeutics, and multidisciplinary precision management. The Translational Potential of this Article. This review highlights clinical mechanisms and emerging targets for NHO, which may enable earlier diagnosis, individualized prevention, and targeted treatment for patients with central nervous system injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.