ArticleMolecular genetics and metabolism reports2026
Tissue-specific expression and regulation of congenital disorders of glycosylation genes: A GTEx-based in silico study.
Article in Molecular genetics and metabolism reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDGs) are rare metabolic diseases characterized by clinical heterogeneity, yet the molecular basis for their tissue-specific manifestations remains poorly understood. Because affected tissues are rarely accessible for biopsy, the baseline transcriptional and regulatory landscape of CDG-causative genes in healthy human tissues offers a valuable, complementary perspective on tissue vulnerability. Here, we performed an in silico study of the expression, allelic regulation, expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs), and associations with immune cell compositions of 12 CDG-causative genes across healthy human tissues using multi-omics datasets from the Adult GTEx project. The selected panel includes the most prevalent multisystem CDGs (PMM2-, ALG6-, ALG1-, SLC35A2-, ALG13-, SRD5A3-, MAN1B1-, DPAGT1-CDG), three immune-relevant CDGs classified as inborn errors of immunity (MOGS-, PGM3-, VPS13B-CDG), and the autosomal recessive form of GNE-CDG (GNE-CDG (ar); GNE myopathy) as a tissue-restricted contrast. CDG-causative genes were broadly but heterogeneously expressed, with substantial inter-individual variation. Tissues frequently affected in the corresponding disorders did not consistently display the highest baseline gene expression, underscoring that higher gene expression alone is a poor indicator of tissue susceptibility. Allele-specific analyses revealed five distinct allelic expression patterns across individuals and identified tissue-specific deviations from balanced biallelic expression for several genes, most notably
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.