ArticleCureus2026
The Clinical Trials Landscape of Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation (TEAS) in Perioperative Care: Current Status and Future Perspectives.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) is a promising, non-invasive, non-pharmacological adjunct for perioperative care, yet a global overview of its clinical trial landscape remains lacking. This study systematically analyzed 239 perioperative TEAS trials (2012-2025) from three major registries (ClinicalTrials.gov, Chinese Clinical Trial Register (ChiCTR), and EU Clinical Trials Register (EU-CTR)). The number of registered trials has grown notably in recent years, with a clear upward trend observed in 2024. Research attention remains heavily concentrated on adult populations, while pediatric applications are comparatively understudied. Digestive system surgeries represent the most common clinical context, and primary outcome measures predominantly focus on symptomatic improvements related to gastrointestinal function and pain relief, with limited emphasis on mechanistic exploration. Furthermore, the majority of trials are either ongoing or yet to commence, orthopedic applications remain underexplored, and substantial heterogeneity exists across current trial designs. We identify critical research gaps and emphasize the urgent need for standardized large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs), pediatric studies, mechanistic exploration, and diversification across surgical specialties. These efforts may help establish TEAS as a potential complementary perioperative therapy alongside pharmacological interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.