ArticleCell death and differentiation2026
Pan-cancer proteogenomic interrogation of the ubiquitin-proteasome system.
Article in Cell death and differentiation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Somatic mutations rewire the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) to support tumor growth, but the proteome-wide consequences of cancer-driver alterations on UPS composition remain incompletely understood. Using harmonized proteogenomic data from up to 11 CPTAC cohorts, we performed an integrated pan-cancer analysis of UPS protein dysregulation, prognostic associations, and mutation-driven remodeling. We show that mRNA poorly predicts UPS protein abundance, that a defined set of E3 ligases is recurrently dysregulated across cancers, and that somatic mutations (most strikingly TP53 loss) produce coherent UPS protein-quantitative trait locus (pQTL) signatures. Two case studies (UBR5 and TRIM28) illustrate orthogonal modes of UPS rewiring: a mutation-driven axis in which TP53-mutant tumors elevate UBR5 to support replication stress tolerance, and a lineage-driven axis in which TRIM28 engages tissue-restricted regulatory networks with opposing prognostic effects in glioblastoma versus head and neck cancer. Each axis exposes context-specific therapeutic vulnerabilities, including sensitivity to DNA damage response inhibitors (UBR5-high) and lineage-specific drug responses (TRIM28-high). Together, these analyses define a mechanistic framework for how cancer-driver mutations reshape proteostasis through the UPS and nominate mutation- and lineage-defined dependencies for precision degrader therapy. The harmonized pan-tissue atlas and the UbiDash interactive resource that underpin parts of this analysis are reported in our companion paper [1].
Identifiers
42472879What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.