ArticleJournal of diabetes research2026
Expression Signatures of Vascular Complication-Associated Proteins in Type 2 Diabetes: A Multiomics Analysis From the FIELD Study.
Article in Journal of diabetes research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Expression Signatures of Vascular Complication-Associated Proteins in Type 2 Diabetes: A Multiomics Analysis From the FIELD Study.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThe aim of the study is to integrate targeted transcriptomic analyses of previously identified biomarker proteins (proteomic findings) to better understand vascular complications (Cx) in Type 2 diabetes (T2D).
methodsTotal RNA was extracted from baseline citrate plasma samples of 543 individuals with T2D from the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) trial. Among these, 224 participants had microvascular Cx, 142 had macrovascular Cx (51 had both types of Cx) and 228 had no Cx (control group). mRNA expression was quantified using the OpenArray platform and group differences were analysed using ΔΔct values. Neutrophil elastase (NE) protein levels were measured in baseline plasma by ELISA.
resultsEleven genes were retained for focused analysis. For microCx, the largest gene expression differences were observed for clusterin (~2-fold upregulation) and integrin alpha-IIb (~50% downregulation), compared with the control group. For macroCx, clusterin exhibited the strongest upregulation (~2.5-fold), whereas apolipoprotein F showed the greatest downregulation (~20%). Comparative analysis of proteomic and transcriptomic data across study groups revealed that only 32% of gene expression differences were mirrored at the protein level. NE levels were highest in the microCx group and were significantly elevated versus control only in that group; NE levels also correlated inversely with circulating actin protein expression (R
conclusionCombining proteomic and targeted plasma transcriptomic data provides exploratory insights into biological processes associated with vascular complications in T2D and highlights NE as a candidate component of a proteolytic pathway for further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.