ArticleBlood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis2026
Venous mechanical thrombectomy for deep vein thrombosis in patients with cancer: a single-center prospective study.
Article in Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes following venous mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in patients with cancer. This single-arm, single-center prospective study evaluated patients with cancer with symptomatic lower extremity or caval DVT treated with venous MT. The primary outcome was clinical success, which was defined as a reduction in the Villalta score by ≥2 points at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included repeat intervention rates and overall survival (OS). Technical success was defined as restoring venous flow with mild (<10%) or no residual filling defect. Twenty-five patients (median age, 63; interquartile range [IQR], 58-71) were included. All patients received anticoagulation. Contraindications to thrombolytics were present in 64% (16/25), and 15 of 25 had indwelling venous devices. Most patients had proximal clot burden, with inferior vena cava and iliac thrombus in 56% and 84%, respectively. Median Villalta scores improved significantly from 10.5 (IQR, 8-14) at baseline to 4 (IQR, 3-6.3) after procedure (Wilcoxon,
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.