ReviewCureus2026
A Narrative Review of Regional vs. General Anesthesia in Cancer Surgery: Immune Pathways and Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The choice between general anesthesia (GA) and regional anesthesia (RA) for oncologic surgery has been widely debated because of the implications for perioperative safety, patient comfort, cancer recurrence, and long-term survival. RA may attenuate surgical stress and preserve immune function, whereas GA, particularly with volatile agents and opioids, may impair immune surveillance. Clinical findings, however, remain inconsistent. The most consistent signals of benefit have been observed in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT), where observational cohorts and limited randomized data suggest reduced recurrence with neuraxial techniques. In contrast, studies in colorectal and lung cancer have shown no significant differences in recurrence or survival. Variability in tumor biology, perioperative care, and anesthetic exposure likely contributes to these discrepancies. This narrative review synthesizes randomized trials and large cohort studies to identify tumor types most likely to respond to anesthetic modulation and to highlight important evidence gaps. Overall, any oncologic effect of anesthetic technique appears modest and tumor-specific, warranting further adequately powered, disease-focused trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.