ArticleClinical medicine insights. Endocrinology and diabetes2026
Numerical and Clinical Accuracy of the FreeStyle Libre 2 System: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study in Critically Ill Patients.
Article in Clinical medicine insights. Endocrinology and diabetes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The accuracy of the FreeStyle Libre 2 system in critically ill patients needing insulin therapy remains inadequately evaluated. Objective: To evaluate the clinical and numerical accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring (FreeStyle Libre 2) and capillary glucometry (StatStrip) compared with central laboratory glucose in critically ill patients requiring insulin therapy. Methods: We conducted a diagnostic accuracy study, evaluating simultaneously two index tests, the FreeStyle Libre 2 and capillary glucose, compared to the central laboratory glucose (venous or arterial) as reference standard. The study included critically ill adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with diabetes or stress hyperglycemia, requiring insulin therapy, and ventilatory or vasopressor support. Numerical accuracy was assessed using ISO 15197:2013 criteria and Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD). Clinical accuracy was evaluated using Clarke and Parkes error grid analysis. Results: A total of 157 paired measurements were collected. FreeStyle Libre 2 showed a MARD comparable to capillary glucose (10.43% vs 7.58%; p=0.14). Neither method met ISO 15197:2013 numerical accuracy criteria. In the clinical accuracy analysis, FreeStyle Libre 2 classified 100% of measurements within zones A+B on both the Clarke and Parkes grids, whereas capillary glucose achieved 97.6% and 100%, respectively. Conclusions: FreeStyle Libre 2 showed numerical accuracy comparable to capillary blood glucose and consistently reliable clinical performance in critically ill patients needing insulin therapy. These results support its potential as an alternative to capillary glucose monitoring in the ICU. More studies involving a greater number of hypoglycaemic events are required to confirm its effectiveness in this critical range.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.