ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
The basic psychological needs of fitness self-testing for Chinese male college students: a qualitative perspective.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Guided by Self-Determination Theory (SDT), this study examined Chinese male college freshmen's perceptions of their fundamental psychological needs in relation to fitness self-testing. Specifically, the study focused on how the educational experience of independently monitoring and enhancing health-related fitness (HRF) supported-or challenged-the satisfaction of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Methods: Ten participants (age: 18-19 years old) were purposively sampled from those whose fitness testing scores ranked in the top or bottom 5% of the class at the end of a semester. Each participant completed monthly self-testing sessions over 4 months. Guided by the SDT, semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted. Constant comparative analysis was used to analyze the data to generate themes. Observation notes and student reflections were utilized for data triangulation. Peer debriefing, member checking, and negative case analysis were conducted to establish the trustworthiness of the data. Results: Four main themes emerged from the data: (a) Autonomy as empowerment and responsibility, (b) Competence satisfaction mixed with frustration, (c) Self-testing as a socially embedded practice, and (d) Self-testing as a catalyst for self-challenge, and self-regulated lifestyle development. Conclusion: The three basic psychological needs in fitness self-testing, autonomy, competence, and relatedness, were central in this context. These findings can inform future fitness self-testing protocols that support student learning, HRF, and social belonging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.