ReviewIntegrative and comparative biology2026
Hermaphrodite, Gonochorist, and More: Navigating the Complexities of Sex-Related Language in Biology.
Review in Integrative and comparative biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolution, Development, and the Incoherence of Sex: A Framework for Multiple Sex Concepts.Integrative and comparative biology · 2026Article
- Synthesizing Sex/es Across Scales and Lineages: Centering Plants, Algae, Fungi, Protists, and Modular Metazoans.Integrative and comparative biology · 2026Article
- Teaching Accurate Sex-related Biology: Approaches for More Socially Just Instruction.Integrative and comparative biology · 2026Article
- Centering Biodiversity: Integrating the Complexity of Sex Into a Developmental Biology Course.Integrative and comparative biology · 2026Article
- Sexes Are Polymorphisms: Describing and Understanding Sexual Diversity as Phenotypic Variation.Integrative and comparative biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
In biology, the term sex is applied to numerous and entangled concepts, leading to language inconsistencies across taxa. Navigating this entanglement and complexity is vital because language not only influences how we communicate about a topic, it also directly shapes the way we conceptualize the world. Sex-related topics (e.g., sex; gender; sexual behavior; reproduction; and sexual, romantic, and related orientations) are areas where the language to describe these nuanced multidimensional spectra is challenging, because these topics are both complex and politically charged, even if we are focused on only communicating within biology. While there are ongoing discussions in biology to address current language needs, there is also the need to use language now, in both research and teaching. Teaching the complexity of sex-related topics in biology is essential, yet these topics are often oversimplified and overgeneralized in teaching contexts. To navigate the need for simplifications in teaching and other contexts, I call for the use of contextualized simplified content, in which one discusses biological complexity before focusing on simplifications. In this way, learners have a larger context for the simplifications they are being taught. The goal of this paper is to provide a resource that supports better usage of currently existing language in biology, allowing time for further development of discussions within biology that address these challenges. To do this, I synthesize terminology in the technical literature related to these topics, identify places where terminological usage has become muddy through oversimplification and overgeneralization, and identify spaces where more conceptual work in biology needs to occur to clarify meaning. While this text still involves some oversimplification, it represents an attempt to balance complexity and clarity in ways that are broadly accessible while inviting future conversations that are necessary to further create clarity in how we conceptualize and communicate about the topics of sex, gender, sexual behavior, and reproduction in biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.