Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42474512›Full record

ReviewSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2026

[Endometriosis pain research in Germany : ENDO-PAIN and StEPP-UPP-two new research consortia on endometriosis pain].

Renata Voltolini Velho, Bruno Pradier, Franziska Werner, Esther M Pogatzki-Zahn, Sylvia Mechsner

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Renata Voltolini VelhoKlinik für Gynäkologie mit Zentrum für onkologische Chirurgie, Endometriosezentrum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.
Bruno PradierKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Operative Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, 48149, Münster, Deutschland. bruno.pradier@ukmuenster.de.
Franziska WernerKlinik für Gynäkologie mit Zentrum für onkologische Chirurgie, Endometriosezentrum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.
Esther M Pogatzki-ZahnKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Operative Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, 48149, Münster, Deutschland.
Sylvia MechsnerKlinik für Gynäkologie mit Zentrum für onkologische Chirurgie, Endometriosezentrum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometriosis is one of the most common causes of chronic pelvic or lower-abdominal pain, yet mechanisms, predictors, and patient-centered treatment pathways remain insufficiently defined. This article summarizes the situation in Germany and presents two complementary research consortia: StEPP-UPP and ENDO-PAIN.StEPP-UPP addresses the clinical heterogeneity of endometriosis pain via a prospective multicenter cohort, standardized patient-reported outcomes, quantitative sensory testing, and multi-omics from blood, stool, and lesions. Explainable artificial intelligence and machine-learning models aim to estimate risk and trajectories of persistent pain, define mechanism-informed subgroups, and support treatment decisions. Preclinical mouse models with non-evoked behavioral metrics plus multiparametric MRI and single-cell analyses provide mechanistic anchoring for clinical signatures.ENDO-PAIN focuses on neuroinflammation and fibrosis as drivers of pain and chronification. Using patient samples, cell cultures, and 3D organoids, it maps immune-stroma interactions, syndecan signaling, and hormone-inflammation axes (for example P4-TGFβ-NFκB-COX-2) to derive biomarker networks and therapeutic targets.Both consortia integrate patient advocacy structurally to ensure patient-relevant endpoints and accessible information. Together they point to three priorities: standardization of data collection and biobanking; stratification along bio-psycho-social profiles and molecular signatures; and interdisciplinary shared decision-making across research, clinics, and people with endometriosis, aiming for mechanistically grounded, data-driven, patient-centered pain medicine.

Indexed as

EndometriosisIntersectoral CollaborationPelvic PainAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleGermanyHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationMiceBiomarkersChronic painFibrosisMachine learningMulti-omics

Identifiers

PMID42474512

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.