ArticleVeterinary research communications2026
Case series of neonatal lamb diarrhea syndrome treated with an evidence-based protocol to reduce antibacterial use.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neonatal diarrhea in lambs remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, yet standardized evidence-based treatment protocols for this species are limited. This prospective case series describes the field outcomes of a practical treatment protocol based on early intervention, oral rehydration, and targeted antibacterial use on a commercial Lacaune dairy sheep farm. The protocol was applied to 103 diarrheic lambs out of 133 born over a 60-day period. Daily clinical assessment included fecal scoring, evaluation of bacteremia signs, hydration status, suckling reflex, and abomasal palpation. All lambs continued voluntary suckling and received oral electrolyte solution daily until recovery. Antibacterials and NSAIDs were administered when at least two bacteremia signs were present, while isolated pyrexia was treated with NSAIDs alone and prolonged diarrhea (> 5 days) with antibacterials only. Mean duration of diarrhea was 4.0 days. Tested diarrheic lambs showed co-infection with rotavirus and Cryptosporidium spp. Bacteremia-compatible signs were observed in 25% of cases, and dehydration in 19%. Approximately 15% of lambs initially presented with isolated pyrexia before developing additional signs compatible with bacteremia, highlighting the importance of close clinical monitoring. Plasma glucose, sodium and potassium concentrations remained statistically stable. There was a 2.9% mortality rate, with all deaths attributed to Escherichia coli bacteremia. Antibacterials were required in only 34% of lambs, indicating that clinical selection criteria may help reduce unnecessary antibiotic exposure. Under field conditions, this protocol was associated with favorable clinical outcomes and supports early intervention, close monitoring, and selective antibacterial use in neonatal lamb diarrhea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.