ArticleActa diabetologica2026
HALP score and risk of renal progression in diabetic kidney disease.
Article in Acta diabetologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimImmunonutritional impairment driven by chronic inflammation and metabolic dysregulation plays a significant role in the progression of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). The hemoglobin-albumin-lymphocyte-platelet (HALP) score is a biomarker reflecting immunonutritional status; however, its prognostic value in patients with advanced DKD remains uncertain.
methodIn this retrospective cohort study, 348 patients with stage 3-4 chronic kidney disease (CKD) secondary to type 2 diabetes mellitus (eGFR 15-59 mL/min/1.73 m²) were included after screening 769 individuals (2012-2024). The primary endpoint was renal progression, defined as a ≥ 40% decline in eGFR or initiation of renal replacement therapy. HALP was initially categorized into tertiles to evaluate baseline differences. Subsequently, a ROC-derived cutoff was used to dichotomize patients into low- and high-HALP groups, followed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Predictive performance was assessed using ROC analysis, and robustness was evaluated through subgroup analyses and 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching.
resultsRenal progression occurred in 181 patients. HALP components and urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR) differed significantly across tertile groups (p < 0.001 for components; p = 0.025 for UPCR). The ROC-derived cutoff was 34.15 (AUC 0.602; p = 0.001). After PS matching (n = 278), low-HALP group remained independently associated with an increased risk of renal progression (HR 1.627; p = 0.005). Subgroup analyses revealed no significant interaction, supporting the consistency of the findings across clinical strata.
conclusionThe HALP score may serve as a simple, cost-effective and widely available adjunctive tool for risk stratification in patients with advanced DKD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42474707What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.