ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2026
Triglyceride-Rich Lipoproteins and ASCVD: Evidence for Causality and Challenges in Therapeutic Translation.
Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review summarizes current evidence linking triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) with emphasis on challenges in translating the epidemiological- and genetic epidemiological findings into therapeutic risk reduction. RECENT
findingsElevated triglycerides and TRL-cholesterol are consistently associated with ASCVD risk in both primary- and secondary-prevention populations. Human genetic studies of pathways involving LPL, APOC3, ANGPTL3, and ANGPTL4 strongly support a causal role for TRL metabolism in atherosclerosis. The pathogenic effects of TRLs may differ from those of low-density lipoproteins (LDLs), with TRLs potentially contributing through both cholesterol deposition and activation of inflammatory pathways. However, therapeutic translation has been less straightforward than for LDL. Fibrates have produced inconsistent cardiovascular outcome results, icosapent ethyl reduces cardiovascular events but probably through mechanisms beyond triglyceride lowering alone, and potent APOC3 inhibition has failed to show short-term coronary plaque regression. Together, these findings suggest that TRLs are causal contributors to ASCVD, but that their therapeutic relevance may depend on disease stage, background LDL-C/apoB burden, and residual metabolic risk. TRLs are biologically and genetically linked to ASCVD, but whether lowering TRLs translates into cardiovascular risk reduction may depend on background therapy and cardiovascular risk context. Future trials must determine whether TRL-targeted therapies reduce ASCVD events beyond contemporary prevention, and in which patients this residual risk remains modifiable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.