ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
Ligand-agnostic off-target site prediction for early toxicity screening by leveraging point cloud-based protein cavity analysis.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adverse drug reactions caused by molecules binding unintended targets are a major concern in drug discovery. Early identification of such interactions during drug design and development minimizes risks and enhances therapeutic efficacy. While experimental approaches are time-consuming and resource-intensive, in silico virtual screening offers a faster, cost-effective strategy to anticipate off-target effects early in drug design. Here, we present a point cloud-based virtual screening method, designed to perform off-target identification based solely on the chemical composition of the primary drug binding site. By screening multidimensional point clouds representing all potential human binding sites, this approach identifies alternative targets based on shape and physicochemical properties. Notably, it operates independently of the protein's overall structure or sequence. This focus on the binding site broadens the search space to structurally unrelated proteins and enables screening without requiring lead molecule information. Using an experimentally validated test set, we demonstrated the method's ability to identify alternative targets across protein families and predict drug promiscuity, achieving a Top-10 recall of 24% for validated, strongly modulated targets. While ligand-agnostic sequence- (BLASTP) and structure-based (Foldseek) methods show higher overall recall, point cloud-based screening uniquely recovers 13.9% (79.4% of its total recovered hits) of known off-targets with <30% sequence identity at Top-100, which are missed by both BLASTP and Foldseek. Beyond known targets, we found several high-ranking candidates not yet annotated as drug-targets but showing notable cavity similarity despite being structurally unrelated, which we present as testable hypotheses for follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.