ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026
Training under attentional competition produces learned biases in visual appearance.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Selective attention can momentarily alter visual appearance, but can such effects be learned? We tested whether training attention under sustained sensory competition produces learned changes in perceived contrast. Across 7 days, participants trained on an orientation discrimination task in which the target appeared at a fixed spatial location, either with or without a salient distractor in the opposite hemifield. Before and after training, we measured perceived contrast using psychophysical estimates of the point of subjective equality. Training under competition produced a reliable opponent shift in relative perceived contrast between the two tested locations: lower physical contrast was required for stimuli at the trained location, whereas higher physical contrast was required for stimuli at the opposite/untrained location, to appear equivalent to the standard. In contrast, training without distractors improved discrimination accuracy but did not alter appearance. These shifts were observed at post-test, replicated across judgment formats designed to minimize response bias, and generalized partially to stimuli differing in orientation and contrast. Together, the findings demonstrate that repeatedly resolving attentional competition does not merely enhance performance but recalibrates the perceptual weighting of visual information, altering how the visual world is experienced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42477228What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.