Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42477244›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

Modeling intraindividual variability in affect (MIVA): Formalized theoretical approach, computational model, and parameter recovery study.

Maria Wirth, Andreas Voss, Stefan T Radev, Klaus Rothermund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria WirthDepartment of Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Am Steiger 3/1, 07743, Jena, Germany. maria.wirth@uni-jena.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6800-3502
Andreas VossDepartment of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Stefan T RadevDepartment of Cognitive Science and Center for Modeling, Simulation, and Imaging in Medicine, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA.
Klaus RothermundDepartment of Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Am Steiger 3/1, 07743, Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

No matter how angry, sad, or happy we are, eventually, we will feel different. Studying this ebb and flow of affective experience in daily life provides important insights into psychological functioning and well-being. We have developed a parsimonious formalized model of intraindividual variability in affect (MIVA), resting on the assumption that such affective changes reflect transactions between an individual and their proximal environment. We provide an outline of its theoretical background, scope, and mathematical formulation. We situate MIVA within the research field of affect dynamics and illustrate the models' behavior under realistic conditions using a simulation study. We use simulation-based inference to train a custom neural network on MIVA simulations, which we employ to rapidly estimate the model's parameters on a multitude of synthetic experiments with different configurations. Our simulation study demonstrates that the synthesis between a computational model and probabilistic neural networks results in an efficient and flexible tool for model-based inference of affect dynamics. Our simulation study also offers insights into the data requirements for a precise recovery of the model's parameters and recommendations for future data collection. The potential of MIVA for providing insights into affect dynamics is discussed.

Indexed as

AffectComputer SimulationIndividualityModels, PsychologicalNeural Networks, ComputerHumansAffect dynamicsEmotional reactivityEmotion regulationMathematical modelingNeuronal networksSimulation-based inference

Identifiers

PMID42477244
PMCPMC13384981

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.