Observational studyBirth defects research2026
Development and Evaluation of an Adaptive Penguin-Improved LSTM Model Integrating Natural Language Processing for Early Prediction of Pregnancy Syndrome Risks.
Observational study in Birth defects research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly prediction of pregnancy syndromes such as preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and preterm birth is critical for improving maternal and fetal outcomes. Traditional risk assessment tools rely primarily on structured clinical data and often fail to fully utilize the rich unstructured textual information contained in electronic health records (EHRs).
objectiveThis study aimed to develop and evaluate an Adaptive Penguin-Improved Long Short-Term Memory (AP-ILSTM) model that integrates natural language processing (NLP) of clinical narratives with structured longitudinal data for predicting the risk of preeclampsia, GDM, and preterm birth.
methodsThis retrospective observational study used de-identified EHR data from 1248 consecutive pregnancies at a single regional hospital in China between April 2024 and April 2025. Structured clinical variables and unstructured free-text clinical notes were preprocessed using standard NLP techniques, including tokenization, TF-IDF weighting, and word embeddings. An Improved Long Short-Term Memory (ILSTM) network with dropout regularization was optimized using the Adaptive Penguin algorithm with Gaussian exploration. The dataset was stratified into training (70%), validation (15%), and independent test (15%) sets. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity (recall), positive predictive value (precision), F1-score, specificity, negative predictive value, ROC-AUC, and mean absolute error, and compared against baseline machine learning models.
resultsOn the independent test set (n = 188), the AP-ILSTM model achieved an accuracy of 98.85%, sensitivity of 98.69%, positive predictive value of 98.75%, F1-score of 98.72%, and ROC-AUC of 0.993, with a mean absolute error of 4.05. It outperformed all baseline classifiers (XGBoost, CatBoost, KNN) and regression models. Clinical narrative embeddings ranked as the second most important predictor after blood pressure trends.
conclusionsThe AP-ILSTM model, by effectively combining structured data with NLP-derived features from clinical narratives and employing adaptive optimization, demonstrated superior performance for early multi-syndrome pregnancy risk prediction. This multimodal temporal approach shows strong potential to support clinical decision-making, although external validation and prospective implementation studies are required before clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.