Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42477508›Full record

ReviewThe New phytologist2026

Partial mycoheterotrophy: a common strategy in arbuscular mycorrhizal plants?

Vincent S F T Merckx, Cas Verbeek, Tomas Figura, Jada Carter, Izai A B S Kikuchi, Franziska E Zahn, Gerhard Gebauer, Sean W Graham, Kenji Suetsugu, Deyi Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Vincent S F T MerckxNaturalis Biodiversity Center, 2333 CR, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3959-8623
Cas VerbeekNaturalis Biodiversity Center, 2333 CR, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8416-9100
Tomas FiguraDepartment of Mycorrhizal Symbioses, Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, Lesní 322, 25243, Průhonice, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5714-7810
Jada CarterNaturalis Biodiversity Center, 2333 CR, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4687-6828
Izai A B S KikuchiNaturalis Biodiversity Center, 2333 CR, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0258-1537
Franziska E ZahnDepartment of Ecology of Fungi, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, 95440, Bayreuth, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8998-8480
Gerhard GebauerLaboratory of Isotope Biogeochemistry, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, 95440, Bayreuth, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1577-7501
Sean W GrahamDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8209-5231
Kenji SuetsuguDepartment of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo, 657-8501, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7943-4164
Deyi WangNaturalis Biodiversity Center, 2333 CR, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2140-2482

Funding

Grantová Agentura České Republiky GN23-05310OH2020 European Research Council 101045057Japan Science and Technology Agency JPMJFR2339Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP25H00944National Natural Science Foundation of China 32501536Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vast majority of land plants transfer part of the organic carbon they produce by photosynthesis to arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi inside their root cells; the fungi in turn help plants to take up nutrients and water from the soil. This carbon can subsequently be acquired from mycorrhizal fungi by rare nonphotosynthetic 'mycoheterotrophic' plants that tap into the same fungal network. However, recent findings suggest that carbon uptake from AM fungi may exist among some green plants too. If so, this would qualify them as partial mycoheterotrophs (mixotrophs) rather than as pure autotrophs. Here, we discuss the evolutionary, ecophysiological, morphological, genetic, and environmental evidence for the existence and prevalence of this trait. We conclude that there is strong, albeit indirect, evidence for its existence, although its taxonomic distribution remains to be determined. This knowledge gap currently prevents us from inferring the magnitude of AM partial mycoheterotrophy in terrestrial ecosystems, which in turn severely limits our understanding of its role in plant establishment and survival and in ecosystem structure and function.

Indexed as

Heterotrophic ProcessesMycorrhizaePlantsBiological EvolutionCarbonCarbonarbuscular mycorrhizaautotrophyloss of photosynthesismixotrophymycoheterotrophypartial mycoheterotrophy

Identifiers

PMID42477508
PMCPMC13491291

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.