ArticleBMC medical education2026
A practical approach to illustrate the importance of the bodily energy and heat balances and of the associated regulatory loops to healthcare students.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraining medical students is a demanding task, and some contents remain difficult to teach and understand. This also applies to topics that require increasing attention. For instance, obesity rates keep rising, while almost each year turns out to be hotter than the last. Consequently, it is inevitable that current healthcare students will one day be confronted with these challenges. But the underlying physiological principles are concepts that prove difficult to understand. To remedy this situation and improve students' awareness and understanding of impacted patients, we have developed an educational tool to illustrate the concepts of metabolic rate and thermoregulation.
methodsFollowing a 'learning by doing' approach, we designed practical courses covering these topics and comprising data production, collection and analysis. Students measure their heart rates, metabolism rates (indirect calorimetry) and body temperature, at rest and during moderate-intensity exercise. They then (i) quantify the amounts of energy expended as muscular work or heat, (ii) characterize heat dissipation mechanisms, and (iii) estimate theoretical core temperature rise in the absence of thermoregulatory control. Their data are ultimately integrated into a large cohort dataset (N = 89), enabling the study of confounding variables (e.g. sex, body size). This course is evaluated by the students via an anonymized web-based survey.
resultsExercise-induced changes in heart rate showed that the test subjects were primarily healthy and challenged at a moderate level only. The measurements and subsequent calculations illustrated that this moderate-intensity exercise induced a strong increase in metabolic rate, and that this additional energy is spent as heat rather than muscle work. A dramatic shift in the relative contributions of the heat dissipation pathways during physical activity were also observed. Finally, average increase rates of core temperature of 1.33 °C/h at rest and 4.4 °C/h during moderate-intensity exercise were estimated. Only minor differences between female and male subjects were observed. This course has received very positive evaluations in recent years.
conclusionsWe present a readily implementable approach that integrates education and science. It is designed to favor medical students' comprehension of metabolic balance and thermoregulation while fostering critical evaluation of data quality and analytical rigor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.