ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2026
Evolutionary history and recombination in the mitochondrial carrier SLC25 superfamily analyzed by similarities in the exon and transmembrane α-helix sequences.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evolutionary history and recombination in the mitochondrial carrier SLC25 superfamily analyzed by similarities in the exon and transmembrane α-helix sequences.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mitochondrial carriers (MCs), which constitute a superfamily also called the solute carrier family 25 (SLC25), are characterized by conserved signature motif sequences and a six-transmembrane α-helical transporter domain. They transport a wide variety of substrates ranging from protons, inorganic ions, citric acid cycle intermediates, and amino acids to nucleotides and cofactors. The superfamily members can be divided into subfamilies, each with a distinct substrate specificity. In an attempt to understand how different subfamilies have evolved, we analyzed the protein sequences of the exons (with conserved boundaries) and the six transmembrane α-helices of MCs from highly diverged organisms. The results show that some MC subfamilies have all exons and transmembrane α-helices most similar to a closely related subfamily, which is consistent with a scenario of gene duplication and mutational divergence from a last common ancestor. However, several MC subfamilies appear to be mosaics of exons and transmembrane α-helices most similar to different and distant subfamilies, which in some cases could be explained by recombination between the superfamily genes during evolution. It seems that this latter mechanism could have played a role in the formation of new subfamilies with different substrate specificities by the combination of MC transporter domain segments that had been optimized previously for binding specific portions of the substrates. This study presents novel evolutionary relationships between MC subfamilies and may provide clues for how protein superfamilies have expanded and how to investigate their evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.