ArticleRenal failure2026
Prognostic value of valve calcification and high cardiothoracic ratio for major adverse cardiovascular events and mortality in hemodialysis patients.
Article in Renal failure, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients are at high risk of valve calcification (VC) and cardiomegaly, defined as cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) ≥0.5. CTR is a widely used indicator of volume overload and left ventricular dysfunction and predicts adverse cardiovascular outcomes. However, the combined prognostic impact of VC and high CTR on cardiovascular mortality remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective, single-center, exploratory study enrolling MHD patients from October to December, 2018. Patients were stratified into four groups based on VC and CTR (<0.5 or ≥0.5). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to evaluate risks and cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), cardiovascular mortality, and overall mortality among groups. Of 312 MHD patients, 37 had no VC with CTR <0.5, 47 had no VC with CTR ≥0.5, 96 had VC with CTR <0.5, and 132 had VC with CTR ≥0.5. Compared to MHD patients without VC and CTR <0.5, those with VC and CTR ≥0.5 had higher risks of MACEs, cardiovascular mortality and overall mortality (adjusted hazard ratios: 4.174, 6.426, and 4.031; 95% confidence intervals: 1.766-9.868, 1.503-27.48, and 1.407-11.55, respectively). During 3-year follow-up, the cumulative incidence of aforementioned outcomes was highest among MHD patients with VC and CTR ≥0.5 (log-rank test,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.