ReviewJournal of surgical oncology2026
Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology Analysis in Cost-Effectiveness of Population-Based BRCA Testing for Ovarian Cancer in the Public Health System.
Review in Journal of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although ovarian cancer is the most lethal among gynecological cancers, access to massive BRCA testing is still limited. Its cost-effectiveness is still a topic of discussion in several countries. In Brazil, olaparib was recently incorporated into the public health system, access to BRCA testing is still limited. In this article, we aim to review the cost-effectiveness of offering BRCA testing to the at-risk population. A working group composed of 14 specialists in surgical oncology and cancer genetics was established to discuss the cost-effectiveness of population-based BRCA testing for ovarian cancer. The project was divided into five main areas, each with subtopics assigned among the 14 participants. They were: the existing clinical testing guidelines, the current healthcare infrastructure in the Brazilian public health system, cost-effectiveness analysis, challenges in implementing prophylactic surgeries, and family counseling and risk communication. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, followed by a series of meetings among the article's contributors to reach consensus on unresolved issues. These discussions aimed to build recommendations based on the best available scientific evidence. Using as a basis the current structure already existing within the Brazilian public health service (SUS [Sistema Único de Saude]), and based on the testing of the at-risk population chosen by our experts, we estimated savings. The net savings for a population of 100 000 women would range from BRL 7030.30 (US$1255.41) to BRL 1853.92 (US$331.05). And these costs could have an even greater impact when public service PARP inhibitors are incorporated. The working group of the Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology understands that large-scale BRCA testing is cost-effective, especially when risk-reducing surgery is implemented. Other measures are important, such as training teams of non-specialists to recognize the population at risk, in addition to creating an entire line of care for patients with ovarian cancer in the SUS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.