Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42478919›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2026

User-Reported Issues With Mental Health Apps: Machine-Assisted Topic Analysis of Social Media Posts.

Jack Bolter, Trisevgeni Papakonstantinou, Paulina Bondaronek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jack BolterDepartment of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Westminster, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0002-7310-6968
Trisevgeni PapakonstantinouDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5116-1531
Paulina BondaronekInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, 222 Euston Road, London, NW1 2DA, United Kingdom, 44 07742966769.ORCID 0000-0003-0096-1234

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 300252/Z/23/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mobile apps marketed to support mental health have become increasingly popular in recent years. Given their widespread use, it is important to identify issues that users experience while using such apps. Understanding these issues may provide insight into the safety and suitability of these apps for individuals seeking mental health support. Objective: Unlike existing research, where user experience issues have been identified through researchers' direct analysis of apps, this study aimed to generate themes relating to user experience issues using comments from app users themselves. An additional aim was to evaluate a human-in-the-loop machine learning approach using structural topic modeling (STM) to analyze vast volumes of data gathered from X (formerly Twitter, developed by Twitter, Inc). Methods: Data relating to five of the most popular mental health apps were collected from the X API using R. A machine-assisted thematic analysis approach combined STM with human qualitative analysis to interpret user-generated posts. An unsupervised topic-modeling approach was tested using models with 5-40 topics and differing covariates (ultimately, a model without covariates was selected). Two researchers independently conducted thematic analysis to interpret and contextualize model outputs. A structural topic model with 10 topics, each comprising 20 X posts, was selected as most appropriate for generating insights. Results: Using R (developed by the R Core Team), 79,703 X posts were collected via the X API relating to five popular mental health apps. After negative sentiment filtering, 19,603 posts remained. Posts spanned March 2006 (the launch of X/formerly Twitter) to December 2022. Researchers collaboratively labeled the 10 topics to identify the primary user experience issue represented in each. Topic 3 was discarded due to low coherence and inconsistency in relation to app user experience, and Topic 5 was discarded because posts reflected app X account activity rather than user experience of the apps. The remaining eight topics were organized into four themes. The first theme, guidance shortfall, included difficulties following guided meditations, challenges selecting appropriate content from large libraries, and incompatibility between app use and home environments. The second theme, technical difficulties, involved subscription access issues and technical faults within apps. The third theme, heightened emotions related to app-affiliated celebrities, captured both over-excitement linked to celebrity involvement and anger directed toward specific celebrities. The final standalone theme, negative impacts of sleep self-monitoring, demonstrated users reporting that tracking sleep adversely affected sleep experience. Conclusions: The combination of STM and human qualitative analysis of X posts identified several user-experienced issues associated with popular mental health apps, often linked to negative outcomes. This study provides evidence that STM can be combined with qualitative methods to rapidly analyze large-scale social media data and generate insights into user experience of mass-reach digital health interventions.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsSocial MediaHumansMachine LearningMental HealthQualitative ResearchAPIapplication programming interfacedigital mental healthhealth behaviorhealth promotionhuman-computer interactionmachine learningmental health appsmHealthmobile appsmobile healthqualitative dataTwitteruser experiences

Identifiers

PMID42478919
PMCPMC13388529

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.